2 Legal-Ethical CE credit hour live (and recorded) interactive webinar presentation on accessibility in teletherapy

Can You Hear Me? The Legal and Ethical Role of Accessibility in Anti-Oppressive and Neurodivergent-Affirming Teletherapy

October 25, 2024
9am Pacific | 10am Mountain | 11am Central | Noon Eastern 

Even though multiple legal and ethical statutes apply to therapists and outline a duty to provide accessible services for disabled clients, few therapists endorse awareness around these issues and fewer still comply with both the letter and spirit of laws and guidance around accessibility.

YES! It's recorded!

Your registration for the live event includes receiving ownership and perpetual access to the self-study.

If you can’t attend, can’t stay for the entirety of the presentation, or wish to review later, you’ll be able to access both the content and the CE from the self-study course that we produce from the recording of the live presentation.

The self-study course will be added to your dashboard a few days after the event.

Live and Recorded

CE Credit Hours

By bringing light to these requirements while providing practical steps and resources to address inaccessibility in teletherapy practice, this 2-hour law and ethics training aims to create familiarity and comfort for therapists providing teletherapy and combat stigma and inaccessibility in teletherapy. 

Almost every therapist switched to providing some form of teletherapy modality at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, and many therapists maintain the use of teletherapy within their practices to this day. Research indicates that a primary reason for poor accessibility and poor disability competence within the counseling field is a lack of awareness around applicable laws and ethical codes combined with a fear of doing the “wrong thing,” which in turn reinforces stigma and inhibits accessibility in therapy for clients of all disability statuses.

Emily Decker, MS, LPC, NC situates this conversation within an anti-oppressive and neurodivergent-affirming framework, connecting concepts of accessibility and disability justice with mental health care, providing an overview of legal and ethical issues pertaining to accessibility within teletherapy, identifying and dispelling common myths about accessibility and disability, and highlighting specific, concrete resources for therapists to use to enhance the accessibility of their services.

icon of computer monitor

Legal Considerations

Define disability, accessibility, and teletherapy and identify main legal and ethical guidelines that apply to the provision of
teletherapy

icon of a home office

Connect the Dots

Explain connections between access, oppression, and harm to marginalized
communities

icon of computer monitor

Accessibility Focus

Identify common accessibility needs around several common client and clinician disability identities – including: neurodivergence, trauma, chronic pain, and sensory disabilities

icon of a question mark

Emerging Technology

Explain the ways in which emerging technologies such as AI may both contribute to and inhibit accessibility and oppression within the practice of therapy

icon of a home office

Compliance Assessment

Assess current teletherapy practices for compliance with reviewed laws and
ethical statutes around accessibility within mental health, specifically
teletherapy

icon of a question mark

Real World Application

Apply gained knowledge to evaluate changes each practitioner can make to
enhance accessibility within their teletherapy practice

Who is this event for?

This course is designed for solo practitioners, group practice leaders, and group practice clinical staff members. It is also suitable for practices that consist of  100% telehealth, or a mixture of in-person and telehealth treatment.

green check mark  Hybrid Practices

green check mark  Teletherapy Only Practices

 Thank you for the information and for making it so accessible. Somehow you take the driest material and make it fun and immediately relevant. You folks knock it out of the park!

Maegan Carney

Course Details

2 CE Credit Hour. Self-Study, On-Demand, Recorded Video Seminar CE training. 

Title: Can You Hear Me? The Legal and Ethical Role of Accessibility in Anti-Oppressive and
Neurodivergent-Affirming Teletherapy

Authors/Presenters: Emily Decker, MS, LPC, NCC
CE Length: 2 CE credit hours, legal-ethical
Legal-Ethical CE Hours: 2 legal-ethical CE credit hours

Educational objectives: 

  • Define disability, accessibility, and teletherapy
    • ADA Definition of Disability
    • US Supreme Court Definition of Accessibility
  • Identify main legal and ethical guidelines that apply to the provision of
    teletherapy
  • Explain connections between access, oppression, and harm to marginalized
    communities
  • Identify common accessibility needs around several common client and
    clinician disability identities
    • Neurodivergence
    • Trauma
    • Chronic pain
    • Sensory disabilities
  • Explain the ways in which emerging technologies such as AI may both
    contribute to and inhibit accessibility and oppression within the practice of
    therapy
  • Assess current teletherapy practices for compliance with reviewed laws and
    ethical statutes around accessibility within mental health, specifically
    teletherapy
  • Apply gained knowledge to evaluate changes each practitioner can make to
    enhance accessibility within their teletherapy practice

    Syllabus:

    1. Survey: Teletherapy, Disability, and Accessibility Experiences
    2. Defining Key Terms
    a. Disability
    i. legal vs. social definitions of disability
    ii. Definitions by disabled people
    b. Accessibility
    c. Teletherapy
    3. Overview of Related Ethical Duties
    a. ACA Code of Ethics
    i. Accessibility in digital communication and websites
    ii. Modification of assessment administration for accessibility
    iii. Provision of interpretation services
    b. Disability-Related Counseling Competencies
    i. Section A: Understanding and Accommodating the Disability
    Experience, which encourages inclusion, as well as viewing
    disability as diversity, demonstrating respect, and understanding
    experiences of oppression and stigma;
    ii. Section B: Advocacy for [People with Disabilities] and Support of
    their Self-Advocacy, which encourages exactly what is described
    in the section title;
    iii. Section C: The Counseling Process and Relationship, which
    outline the need for accommodations and accessibility, caution
    against overgeneralization and stereotyping, and ensure
    treatment matches the client’s needs and capacities,
    iv. Section D: Testing and Assessment, which calls on counselors to
    understand the ways in which assessment and testing is rooted
    in ableism, ensure tools are appropriately normed for the client’s
    population (i.e. disability), account for the impact of context and
    environment on results, and provide reasonable accommodation
    during the assessment process.
    v. Section E: Working With or Supervising [People with Disabilities]
    in School Employment, Community, and Clinical Settings, which
    encourages identifying inappropriate or stigmatizing language
    and practices, understanding systemic oppression, recognizing
    the rights of disabled people, understand major legal concepts
    and civil rights laws regarding disabled people, strive to
    implement universal design standards, engage in mentorship,
    and seek consultation to avoid abuse of privilege and power.
    4. Overview of Related Legal Duties
    a. ADA
    i. Title I: Employment (15+ employees)
    1. Discrimination:
    2. Hiring, advancement, compensation, training, benefits,
    privileges, terms & conditions
    a. Including due to need for accommodations
    3. Segregating/classifying employee resulting in opportunity
    loss
    4. Using standards that perpetuate discrimination
    a. Including selecting/administering qualifications
    tests in ways that don’t accurately reflect disabled
    employee’s skills
    5. Not making reasonable accommodations
    6. Working with an organization that does any of the above
    to an employee
    7. Requiring abilities unrelated to job functions
    a. Ex: requiring therapists to be able to walk 10 feet
    unassisted
    8. Requiring medical examinations unrelated to job duties
    ii. Title II (State and Local Gov’t) & III (Businesses Open to Public)
    1. Equal opportunity to benefit from all programs, services,
    and activities
    2. Meet physical ADA accessibility requirements
    3. Modify business policies & procedures for reasonable
    accommodation
    4. Allow access to service animals and mobility devices
    5. Take steps to communicate effectively with people w/
    vision, speech, and hearing limitations
    iii. Section 508 :
    1. Requires all websites and electronic materials to be
    accessible to people with disabilities
    b. HIPAA
    i. Security in communication
    1. Applies to accessibility features like captions, too
    5. Compliance vs. Accessibility
    a. Identifying and challenging norms vs rules for teletherapy
    b. Applying social justice and anti-oppressive principles to disability and
    accessibility
    6. Teletherapy Considerations for Various Disabilities
    a. Neurodivergence
    b. Trauma
    c. Chronic pain and chronic illness
    d. Sensory disabilities
    7. AI: Helping or Hurting Accessibility?
    a. Overview of potential benefits for AI use
    b. Overview of potential costs for AI use
    c. Applying ethical principles to weigh these considerations
    8. Practical Steps to Increase Accessibility
    a. Script for broaching accessibility with clients
    b. Resources for auditing accessibility
    c. Overview of disability-affirming practices (handout)
    d. Additional resources around integrating disability justice principles into
    therapy spaces and exploring disability as a multicultural identity

    Meet Our Presenter

    Presented by

    Emily Decker, MS, LPC, NC

    tara sanderson

    Emily Decker, MS, LPC, NCC (she/they) is a doctoral candidate in counseling education at George Washington University in Washington, D.C., as well as a 2023 NBCC Minority Doctoral Fellow. She has a Master’s degree in Clinical Rehabilitation Counseling from Portland State University. She specializes in disability cultural competence and disability identity. Her passion for “going directly to the need” has led her to work in schools, emergency rooms, crisis centers, housing transition programs, skill rehabilitation programs, community mental health agencies, and everywhere in between. In her Oregon-based private practice, Emily is a pioneer of accessibility, and has been providing disability-affirming therapy since 2016, and teletherapy since 2018. Emily also provides disability-affirming clinical supervision to pre-licensed counselors and consultation services to mental health practices and education settings seeking to enhance the accessibility of their services and increase cultural competence around disability. Emily identifies as a white, queer, fat, neurodivergent, immunocompromised, disabled human.

    esources & Citations: (Estimated, Abridged)

    American Counseling Association. (ACA; 2014). 2014 ACA code of ethics.
    https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/2014-
    code-of-ethics-finaladdress.pdf

    Americans With Disabilities Act [ADA] of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328.
    (1990). https://www.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/

    Andrews, E. E. (2020). Disability as diversity: Developing cultural competence.
    Oxford University Press.

    Andrews, E. E., Ayers, K. B., Brown, K. S., Dunn, D. S., & Pilarski, C. R. (2021). No
    body is expendable: Medical rationing and disability justice during the COVID-19
    pandemic. American Psychologist, 76(3), 451–461.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000709

    Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2023, May 15). Disability Impacts All of Us
    Infographic | CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/infographic-disability-impacts-
    all.html

    Chapin, M., McCarthy, H., Shaw, L., Bradham-Cousar, M., Chapman, R., Nosek, M.,
    Peterson, S., Yilmaz, Z., & Ysasi, N. (2018). Disability-related counseling
    competencies. American Rehabilitation Counseling Association, a division of ACA.
    https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/competencies/arca-disability-
    related-counseling-competencies-final-version-5-15-19.pdf

    Cornell University. (2022). Definition of disability. Disability Statistics. Accessed
    2/1/2013. https://disabilitystatistics.org/faq.cfm#content


    Corrigan, P. W., Druss, B. G., & Perlick, D. A. (2014). The Impact of Mental Illness
    Stigma on Seeking and Participating in Mental Health Care. Psycholo

     

    Cree, R.A., Okoro, C.A., Zack, M.M., & Carbone, E. (2020). Frequent mental distress
    among adults by disability status, disability type, and selected characteristics –
    United States 2018. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2020, 69, 1238-
    1243. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a2

    Czeisler, M. É., Board, A., Thierry, J. M., Czeislet, C. A., Rajarnatham, S. M. W.,
    Howard, M. E., & Clarke, K. E. N. (2021). Mental health and substance use among
    adults with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic — United States, February–
    March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021, 70, 1142–1149.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7034a3

    Deroche, M.D., Herlihy, B., & Lyons, M.L. (2020). Counselor trainee self-perceived
    disability competence: Implications for training. Counselor Education & Supervision,
    59. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12183

    Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2021). New Analysis: More U.S. Adults Identify as Disabled;
    Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities Persist.
    https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/newsroom/news-releases/2021/11/new-
    analysis-more-us-adults-identify-as-disabled-ethnic-and-socioeconomic-disparities-
    persist

    Ladau, E. (2022). Demystifying disability. Ten Speed Press.

    Lewis, T. A. (2022). Working Defitition of Ableism—January 2022 Update. TALILA A.
    LEWIS. https://www.talilalewis.com/blog.html

    Lund, E.M., Wilbur, R.C., & Kuemmel, A.M. (2020). Beyond legal obligation: The role
    and necessity of the supervisor-advocate in creating a socially just, disability-
    affirmative training environment. Training and Education in Professional Psychology,
    14(2), 92-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000277

    Lund, E. M., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Wilson, C., & Mona, L. R. (2020). The COVID-19
    pandemic, stress, and trauma in the disability community: A call to action.
    Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000368

    Mackelprang, R. W., Salsgiver, R. O., & Parrey, R. C. (2021). Disability: A Diversity
    Model Approach in Human Service Practice (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Olkin, R. (2019). The Experiences of Microaggressions against Women with Visible
    and Invisible Disabilities. Journal of Social Issues, 75(3), 757–785.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12342

    Ratts, M. J., & Greenleaf, A. T. (2017). Multicultural and Social Justice Counseling
    Competencies: A Leadership Framework for Professional School Counselors.
    Professional School Counseling, 21(1b), 2156759X1877358.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X18773582

    Rivas, M. & Hill, N.R. (2018). Counselor trainees’ experience with counseling
    disability: A phenomenological study. Counselor Education, 57(2), 116-131.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12097
     
    Rivas, M. (2020). Disability in counselor education: Perspectives from the United
    States. International journal for the advancement of counseling, 42, 366–381.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-020-09404-y

    Smart, J. F., & Smart, D. W. (2006). Models of disability: Implications for the
    counseling profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 84(1), 29–40.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2006.tb00377.x

    Strike, D. L., Skovholt, T. M., & Hummel, T. J. (2004). Mental health professionals’
    disability competence: Measuring self-awareness, perceived knowledge, and
    perceived skills. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49(4), 321–327.
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.49.4.321

    Wilbur, R.C., Kuemmel, A., & Lackner, R.J. (2019). Who’s on first? Supervising
    psychology trainees with disabilities and establishing accommodations. Training and
    Education in Professional Psychology, 13(2), 111-118. Doi:
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/tep0000231

    Woo, H., Goo, M. and Lee, M. (2016), A content analysis of research on disability:
    American Counseling Association journals between 2003 and 2013. Journal of
    Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44, 228-244.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12051

     

    Accuracy, Utility, and Risks Statement:
    This training discusses strategies for compliance with some federal laws, including
    the ADA and HIPAA. While the presenter has worked to assemble information from a
    variety of vetted and valid resources, the presenter is not an attorney. Further,
    clarifications and modifications around these laws, and many other laws and
    statutes pertaining to disability, continue to emerge. Additionally, this presentation does not address state- or profession-specific laws and statutes that may apply.
    Misapplication of the material in this presentation, or errors in the materials, may
    result in noncompliance with applicable laws and ethics.

    Conflicts of Interest: None stated or known.

    Commercial Support: None

      v2.0.3-beta

      Scheduled Maintenance

      We will be temporarily taking the website offline at 10:00 PM Pacific (1:00 AM Eastern) tonight, July 6, in order to make some improvements. We plan to be back online by midnight Pacific (3:00 AM Eastern). We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Dismiss